The NY Times provides additional information on the government program aimed at goading banks into modifying mortgages rather than foreclosing. It appears to be challenging for the banks and progress has been slow. Only about one fourth of the originally projected 4 million modifications are likely to occur at the present rate. It's an interesting contrast with the behavior of investment funds who appear to be able to modify the loans efficiently. What is it with the banks? Is it guvmint red tape? Is it the hope of another bailout? Is it a learning curve? Is it those pesky borrowers who can't seem to fill out paperwork or document income in a timely fashion? Is it misaligned financial incentives? Or are the banks too big to be efficient or competent at learning a new and necessary skill quickly AND too big to fail? Is it rocket science to retool and retrain your workforce with new skills? Isn't that one of the beauties of capitalism: that it makes firms quicker to respond to market changes? Too big to fail and too big to change seems like a bad combination for a large financial institution. Did we bail out the General Motors of banks? If so, maybe they are the ones that should be "modified?"
Just sayin'...
Comments